As a highly detailed crime investigator, it is clear that the evidence presented against Hannah Gutierrez Reed in the rust case is damning. From the origin of the live rounds to the mishandling of firearms on set, there are numerous red flags that point to negligence on her part. The testimony from witnesses, including the script supervisor and crime scene technician, further solidifies the prosecution’s case that Gutierrez Reed ran an unprofessional and sloppy operation.
The fact that live rounds found on set did not match the ammunition provided by the supplier, Seth Kenny, raises serious questions about where the live rounds came from. Gutierrez Reed’s own words, admitting to taking ammunition from another production and leaving rounds in her car for weeks, only adds to the mounting evidence against her.
The defense’s argument that Gutierrez Reed was spread too thin and not given enough resources to do her job falls flat when the line producer testifies that she was actually given additional armor days and denied requests for additional training days. The evidence of drug use the night before the shooting, as well as the attempt to tamper with evidence by hiding cocaine, paint a troubling picture of Gutierrez Reed’s actions leading up to the tragic event on set.
Overall, it is clear that Gutierrez Reed’s actions, or lack thereof, played a significant role in the fatal shooting on the rust movie set. The negligence and unprofessionalism on display during the filming of the scene inside the church ultimately led to the loss of life and serious injuries. As a crime investigator, it is imperative to look at all the facts and evidence presented in this case to determine the level of responsibility Gutierrez Reed bears in this tragic incident.
