BREAKING: LIVE updates on the lawsuit filed against ChatGPT for alleged defamation. Lawyers respond to sanctions, sparking heightened scrutiny into the controversial AI platform’s ethical practices. Stay tuned for the latest developments in this potentially landmark case.
Fact: ChatGPT has faced criticism for generating harmful and misleading content, leading to accusations of facilitating defamation. The legal battle between the plaintiffs and ChatGPT could shape the future of AI technology and its impact on society.
@LWM521
Danger, danger Will Robinson!
@2bafamily335
Omg?! They have a light?! I haven’t opened. Is the kit still for sale? Need another if I’m going to use! Lol
@integralmath
Looking at the commands he was prompting ChatGPT with, you just know this dude was thinking to himself, 'man, I found myself a motherfucking ostrich that lays golden eggs.'
'provide more case law to support my argument.'
BEEP, BOOP. Here you go, boss! I've got a million more where those came from.
ChatGPT should not be advising counsel to consult a lawyer. Not enough shade. It should tell him to consult a better lawyer.
@Thedarkbunnyrabbit
Oh my gosh. I'm gonna lose it. Anyone who uses GPT extensively would know how insane this lawsuit is. GPT is NOT an AI. It's an auto-complete bot that's highly advanced. It just makes stuff up. It can give you accurate information…but the operative word is can – it often just gives you nonsense, too. The more specific and niche the knowledge, the more likely GPT is just writing something to make you happy, not giving you information.
@ilovepiano27580
How did I get here hahaha
@warren-cga
The problem I see with this lawsuit against chatgbt is that the same text that is being generated will never be generated for another person exactly, and based on the context of the inputs before would have determined the output. I'm not sure if these lawyers did their due diligence because if the lawyers tried to correct the AI by uploading the real document highly likely the act of doing that would confuse it even more. Also no one in open ai would have a vendetta against the person the bot is just aggregating what they see online or just making it up, so, hopefully it's in their terms that's the case. No one with a little IT sense goes on chatgbt and assume the info generated is completely factual, for me a software engineer I see it also hallucinate on topics that have only one right answer so I always exercise caution fact check things it output. It's just an assistance for quickly covering topics and not necessarily exact especially when it come on to nuanced conversation
@juliearaiza3465
Chat … is new 6 the lawyers in that firm would have significant glitches and very buggy. He, for god sakes, was practicing law when computers were first available and. even 😂more buggy, cell phones . I think they should all retire from practicing law because they can't remember 20 years back to the rise ofthose tech and how glitchy.
@juliearaiza3465
The iñquìŕee, repòŕter, should have çĥecķeð the reß🎉for truthfulness.
@juliearaiza3465
It's a machine and only works as wwell as it was programmed Did the individual that made the inquiry check the the summary for accuracy? Cause if they had this laW suit.
@juliearaiza3465
Noone would think that Jack DANIEL'S made the the toy unless the dog toy was sold on the website. That is extremely unlikely.
@JM-ts3ni
Where is this awesome shirt?! Waaa
@daniellewilson4778
… what about your County law library? Wouldn’t they have access to these databases? I mean, up until 8 years ago, my public library had West Law…
@cruisecontrol441
I would be funny if ChatGPT knows something we don't about the defamation case because it can dig into the internet files and accounts that a person couldn't without subpoenas, etc. ChatGPT should file a response and represent itself haha
@maikolosav
"A research tool"????? Since when is chatGPT considered a research tool? 😂 They're literally making things up to cover their 🍑🍑
@BecksBSL
My dog has this toy, I have never seen a bottle of JD in a shop and thought ‘oh my dog plays with a toy that looks like this bottle I’m not buying it’ he also has a ‘Jamuttson’ I think the same company make this and I still buy Jameson!
For me personally all it’s done it’s done is encourage me to buy the toy for my friends dogs and understand that JD clearly score 0 on the sense of humour scale
@orbitalchild
"Where is your paralegal" they quite due to their attorney's incompetence
@redpill1940
What I have found is that in the chat GPT gives a disclaimer before it gives a response.
Any inaccurate information is called a hallucination..
@savannahgary6351
I'm dieing of second hand embarrassment for this attorney! On the other hand this is also happening….😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
I, too, am like EDB! Forgetting school supplies for kindergarten is probably more common than you think, EDB. Who know 5 year old children needed school supplies? Not me!
To compound the embarrassment of my ignorance, my precious boy was crying because mommy wasn't staying with him, and then I started crying too….the teacher had to ask me to leave and inform me my crying was fueling his crying! Eeek!
💜💜💜💜
@maikolosav
But chatGPT does not have direct access to the internet. It cannot browse the internet and find the complaint. So I'm surprised it gave this answer instead of saying something like "I can't access this document"
@sargeoutdoors969
Chat GPT heard you dissin it online and programed your robot vacuum.. you might want to switch back to a manual vacuum lol
@DeadPiixxel
deep voice
@Max-uc1xd
The joy her laughter at 1:51 gives is worth the price of upgraded West Law!
@semiprokeloi
They need to hold the company accountable for coding the ai to not hallucinate. That’s their responsibility to not allow that to happen. Like they’re responsible to train it not to write political stuff and malicious content or predictions.
@myishaleigh
Such a boomer error.
@jacksyoutubechannel4045
I actually think the Jack Daniel's case would be more difficult if JD didn't actually license their trademark for pet toys. The likelihood of confusion between a whiskey distiller and a gag gift company is a lot less than the likelihood of confusion between a dog toy made using the licensed mark of a whiskey distiller and a dog toy made using a parody of the distiller's mark.
ETA: I'm interested to know if courts can consider Jack Daniel's reputation outside the United States. There are countries where Jack Daniel's is considered a premium, upscale liquor. I also wonder how much they can consider the impact on Jack Daniel's ability to license it's trademark, not just revenue from it's drinkers (I would suspect they can, but this isn't my area of expertise).
@natv6294
Would you cover the lawsuit against the Ai image gens like Midjourney? Many are interested in that
@christineanderson487
as i recall Ariana stole sandoval from kristen yrs ago. its about time Ariana got karma for messing with a man already w/locked down
@smittycat359
Great, so now we have to worry about deep fakes and false accusations by ChatGPT? Ugh.
@CallmeGNana
Beguiling ChatGPT will tell you anything to get into your briefs….
@aguyslifeyt
My only thoughts about the ChatGPT sanctions case and the reaction….people put a lot of trust in data aggregator subscriptions/databases. It's only because the company is "trusted" these days that people don't go all the way back to the original court documents to pull them directly from court. You trust what the database returns. For ChatGPT, if you assumed it worked like any other database, why would you second guess it. Imagine if a rogue person at a "trusted" company started altering their database results — the same thing that happened with ChatGPT could happen to anyone. I have a feeling the same mocking/disbelief was happening when people moved from books to digital databases… I don't fault the less-than-tech-savvy from believing all the hype around AI — people trust it way too much and don't understand it.