Petito v. Laundrie. Shocking new facts revealed in the discovery fight. The Emily Show Ep. 198


Intense investigation uncovers shocking revelations in Petito v. Laundrie discovery battle. The Emily Show Episode 198 delves into the truth behind the mysterious disappearance of Gabby Petito and the prime suspect, Brian Laundrie. As authorities piece together the timeline of events leading up to Petito’s tragic demise, secrets are emerging that shed new light on the case. Stay tuned as we unravel the layers of this chilling true crime story.

source

23 Comments to “Petito v. Laundrie. Shocking new facts revealed in the discovery fight. The Emily Show Ep. 198”

  • @TheEmilyDBaker

    Use code LawNerd to get 20% off and Free Shipping. https://www.manscaped.com

    Find your forever pieces @jennikayne and get 15% off with promo code LAWNERD at jennikayne.com/home ! #jennikaynepartner #ad

    Get 20% OFF @honeylove with promo code LAWNERD at https://www.honeylove.com/ ! #honeylovepod #ad

  • @sandyschneider6792

    Morally: the behavior’s of Brian Laundry was horrible! I understand the parent’s panic & confusion but enabling a murderer is atrocious!

  • @sandyschneider6792

    Such an incredibly sad situation. Law & ethics do not go hand in hand…unfortunately…

  • @rebekahcopeland500

    Q. could the police not charge Mr and Ms L for perverting course of justice? Frankly, I am surprised that they have not.

  • @hazelangus

    The statement released by Bertolino on September 19th, the day Gabby was found… "heartbreaking, prayers and bla"

    Emotionally-speaking, this is rubbing salt in an open wound. For Gaby's parents, i just can't. What they had gone through, the pleading and repeated crying-out to the Laundries, and now on the very day she is found (with no help or support from them), Bertolino is pretending they gave a shit? No. Just NO.

    Legally-speaking, this is tricky, surely. Do people really want a situation where a lawyer is unable to vigorously represent a client, or does that not count if they're not in court? Surely that still counts.

    Unless he was lying, of course, which seems to be where they're going. But even if he was untruthful, did he actually lie? Or does the truthfulness of a statement not actually matter, if it causes severe emotional distress and it can be foreseen that it would cause such distress?

    Which leads me right back to where I began: Do we want a situation where a lawyer is unable to vigorously represent a client?

  • @jediping

    Just because Brian took the coward’s way out of this, could his parents not still be held as accessories for helping conceal him and his acts? Or does the murder have to have been proved in court?

  • @kierangb

    Just got around to watching – wondering if there's an inference that the mother knew what he was planning prior to the couple's departure.

  • @facialsonDemand

    Could they be protected by the 5th amendment?

  • @pagevaughn9194

    To me, if there was important information that was being held back to protect there son. To me thatis unlawful. If its not unlawful, it needs to become anew law!!

  • @Nireni

    51:08 The way she words this sounds like the mother was jealous of her soon to be daughter in law, it brought strains on the relationship and so she wrote him a letter.

    If not then what kind of letter is it? Did she know her son was disturbed and could hurt someone?

  • @awkward_gravity

    I call 100% BS if they try to swing "I meant reunited in whatever way." Lawyers know how to choose their words and the implication was more than clear. I could honestly never be on this jury and honestly if this makes it to trial the Laundrie's better hope someone like me isn't there because I would 100% be talking to the rest of my co-jurors about that.

  • @millsykooksy4863

    Incredibly sad, RIP Gabby

  • @JustJenny615

    “I’ve got the shovel” was a common phrase my very BFF and I used to use with each other.

  • @cparsonage9925

    If she has nothing to hide , allow it !

  • @ninaj84

    The letter is public for all to read now

  • @eltern_herz

    Either premeditation By the letter or they did not warn about a possible Crime in the Future. Either way in Front of Court Its Bad.

  • @elliekaytea6710

    Emily!! Please do cover this! We were all so engrossed in this, so invested in this, so engrossed by it! Please do allow for us to follow this through with our community!

  • @funnytime1111

    If they can convince the jury that they knew information about Gabby’s whereabouts but chose to hide that information, could they be criminally charged for aiding and abetting?

  • @sillyk6688

    Another issue… I noticed Gabby's mother crying in this hearing. I wonder if it's real.

    I don't say that to be rude or insensitive, but to point out how gnarly the questioning and issues in this trial would be.

    Is she still that upset at what the Landries did a year and a half later, or is it the trial itself dredging up emotions?

    And how much of the emotional distress was due to what the Landries did versus the death of their child, due to murder no less? For most parents the death of a child is the worst pain they can endure. When dealing with damages, they would have to establish this, won't they?

    This case just seems like a nightmare.

    And btw, I could easily have been a prospective juror for this possible trial because I knew nothing of the case until about a month ago when I saw it on The Behavior Panel. I just don't follow such news events.

  • @ScorpioBeauty

    As a mom, I think it’s easy for anyone to say what they would or wouldn’t do until you are truly faced with that situation. Morally, everyone wants to do right but I’m sure there’s also a sense of duty to protect your son or daughter.

  • @silikon2

    Warhol's painting is a copy of that photograph cropped a bit and with some color applied. How is this not obviously derivative?

  • @neps1

    When I was a teenager, I wrote a letter to my best friend where I wrote the same thing about hiding a body. I never meant that literally, obviously. It was just me being an overly dramatic teen. Roberta's letter is evidence that she's juvenile, but not evidence that she committed an actual crime.

Leave A Comment