22 September
Videos
Social Media Circus – Donna Adelson Commentary Getting Absurdly Cuckoo
- tcweekly
- Adelson new evidence, adelson trial, charles adelson, Charlie Adelson, criminal analysis, Dan Markel, Dan Markel timeline, dan markel trial, donna adelson analysis, Donna Adelson calendar, donna adelson evidence, donna adelson in court, donna adelson trial, donna adelson trial updates, donna adelson updates, first appearance, james owens, murder, murder for hire, new adelson video, new on donna adelson, Sarah Boone, true crime community, wendi adelson, wendi adelson trial
- 42 Comments
Unraveling the Social Media Circus: Delving into the Donna Adelson Commentary and the Absurdly Cuckoo Details of the Case. Donna Adelson’s involvement in the murder of her daughter-in-law, law professor Dan Markel, has brought sensational attention to this twisted family drama. The intricate web of deceit and manipulation played out on social media platforms exposes the dark underbelly of a seemingly normal suburban facade. As investigators piece together the puzzle of this heinous crime, they are confronted with a barrage of false leads and red herrings, making the truth harder to discern. The absurdly cuckoo elements of the case only serve to deepen the mystery surrounding the Adelson family and their tragic connection to Markel’s murder.
@InvestIQ_Keith
If a plea deal is in the works then the faster they arrest Wendy and Harvey the quicker they will all start scrambling and talking and working something out
@MeOldMateMurphy
I’m trying to figure whether Raspberry Rashbaum if a worst lawyer than the clowns who allowed KM to be locked away for life. It’s a close call.
Yes it’s a Bar issue but my opinion honestly held is that Rashbaum has taken money under false pretences
@dcat6093
I think Rashbaum first represented Donna, then when Charlie was arrested, he represented Charlie. I think it's possible that Donna was so overwhelmed when she was arrested that she threw up her hands and went with the lawyer she knew – Rashbaum.
@franceshaypenny8481
Love Mini Mentor!
@dee1955
“It makes zero sense for Dan Rashbaum to take the case…..”? How about more money?
@John-b6s5x
Georgia and her side kick screwed up to
@franceshaypenny8481
It doesn't surprise me that Charlie hurt his mother.
@sionnach3104
Of course there’s an advantage in a quick trial but not much when it’s been 10+ years already. And, Donna Adelson has a 6th Amendment right to counsel of her choice BUT where your former client can revoke his waiver at any stage & torpedo a trial why would any ethical, prudent counsel with good judgment take the risk? They wouldn’t.
@aliceinwonderland1120
Nothing unethical???? Not clearing conflicts and getting clear written waivers is malpractice. Rashbaum should be disciplined by the Florida bar. Harvey should sue to recover the fees paid.
@valfisher9936
Wendi will never be tried – this is a circus.
@HeardItThruTheTapedLine
We can agree to disagree.
@Two_Deep
Thanks #mentourlawyer love your #truecrime channels 👍#floridaman #truecrimecommunity
@vaneast411
The judge should never have allowed DR to represent Donna due to the obvious potential conflicts
@davidpp330
I understand it wasn’t Rashbaum’s plan, but do you not feel like it was Charlie playing the chess pawns? Charlie thinks in racing thoughts. Charlie is not only looking out for himself and his appeal, but I strongly feel like he’s also trying to have some influence on his Mom’s trial. That’s the way Charlie is. Charlie is incarcerated. It must feel incredible to him that he was able to have this involvement in Donna’s trial. This has Charlie’s personality written all over it! No doubt in my mind at all!
@MissDemeanorOG
Thou doth protest too much
@MissDemeanorOG
A verbal agreement is worth the paper it’s written on Lawyer 101
@hartmatterhorn
The end of this was delightful thank you
@JaniceLawyerRetired
On a lighter note.. I received my Deep Drive True Crime mug intact here in the UK… 🎉Thank you!!
@kaydee7409
What makes less sense is that Donna chose Rashba to represent her when he lost the case for her son. That is what doesn’t make any sense. It makes sense. Rashba would take the case because it’s all about the money. Hello it’s not rocket science here. He’s not embarrassed. Are you kidding me? He’s laughing all the way to the bank! And he was happy to jump that sinking ship are you kidding me? It was the perfect way out for him. Come on mentor lawyer you’re smarter than that. You’ve got to know that it’s the truth.
@DMS1010
Mentour you did not think this was a big deal a few days ago. Are you changing your tune?
@tommeredith7462
This turned out to be a Demerit on the part of Rashbaum.
He keeps his two clients thinking he will deliver a not guilty verdict or a hung jury.
He snowed Charlie and Donna.
@cathybenadaro
We know she is guilty but i really felt sympathy for her when he withdrew.She looked so lost.At her age, i would re-evaluate my options and see what could benefit me in a plea deal.She will never have her family unit in her control again.
@Lei3195i
I agree with the gentleman who spoke at the end. Very eloquent. It is not nice to get someone in trouble when you do not have all of the facts, and when you have no idea whether they did something wrong, or not.
@phoebebeach1194
lol, “I don’t think I have anything appropriate to say at this time” -Georgia Cappleman 😂
@lewisjm8776
I think Donna was going to throw Charlie under the bus, which is why he had a change of heart
@Arlene-e2g
ML- so is the short answer in all of this, Rashbaum should never agreed to represent Donna? (Waiver, no waiver, signed waiver, verbal waiver doesn't matter waiver, as Charlie could have changed his mind at any time regardless of a waiver)
@MomentsInTrading
Rashbaum did say on the record that he had verbal confirmation from Charlie last November that he would wave conflict.
Charlie changed his mind. The fact that the confirmation last November wasn’t in writing is irrelevant.
There isn’t anything controversial about this, except for the fact that Charlie changed his mind at the last minute.
I haven’t watched the coverage on other channels, but let me guess-
Tim, Carl, STS, Court TV, and Law and Crime are all lying for clicks and views. Why anyone watches any of them is beyond me.
Actually it’s not- People would rather be lied to and have their bias confirmed than hear the truth.
So what’s the lie this time? Rashbaum did something unethical or he’s going to be in trouble for something? He had a waiver. Charlie exercised his Right and removed his consent. Rashbaum withdrew as counsel immediately. That isn’t a controversy!
@jaybone58
you have won a lot of competitions, Mentour!! Congrats!
@dawndacquisto
a voice of reason – much appreciated
@polly6336
Out of interest, is there one channel/ social media account in particular that's pushing this notion to make complaints about this debacle? I'm only following ML, because he keeps it real and drama-free.
@LikeandSubscribe007
I’m surprised an oral agreement can be sufficient.
@Enig_Mata
You are right – many people have gone nuts regarding this case. Whether or not she got a waiver meant nothing because Charlie could have retracted it at anytime during the trial. The judge warned her about it and she chose to proceed. At this point, it does not matter because it's more Adelson money being spent on new lawyer as Donna remains in jail. My only request is that they arrest Harvey and Wendi and let them sit in jail as well. Let's not forget Katie sat in jail for about 6 years.
I think some people planned their vacation around this case and are just upset they are not able to witness the trial in person. It's beyond ridiculous that a certain person seems to think her real estate appraiser's license has the same weight as a law license😂
@josephbaker707
You’re exactly right about this Mentour Lawyer.
@MichaelHiers-eb4tc
The prosecution has made it this way, this was totally avoidable
@heavenbound7508
TY!!! Usually I am not able to hear and understand you very well but in this video ALL WAS PERFECT!!!
TY so much for sharing and informing us about this case!!!
Auntie Lori ❤
Vancouver, WA USA 🇺🇸
@OldPuebloHops
ML, I don’t think you’re being objective with regard (or regards as Rashbaum would say) to this issue as you like him personally. And that’s okay but be honest with yourself. This was a colossal error in judgement, and Rashbaum deserves the criticism he’s receiving as a result. He blew it.
@aishahwilliams378
It’s Patty’s Playhouse and Katie Cool Lady pushing this false narrative that Dan Rashbaum did this on purpose. It’s absurd to think he planned to purposely sabotage this case. People act like an attorney can’t make a MISTAKE and the comments on this case are getting completely out of hand. It’s no longer about justice for Dan Markle, people are just looking to make money off this case, and for whatever reason, have made Dan Rashbaum their target. It’s sickening. This is why everyone shouldn’t have a platform because conspiracy theories are not facts. Patty’s playhouse and Katie Cool Lady should be ashamed of themselves for trying to go after Dan’s livelihood/career. Thank you for your opinion on the matter ML.
@surgedeb
I thought the appellate attorney's assistant said at the hearing that Charlie NEVER gave his consent. Did I hear that wrong? And it's also untrue that we don't know the reason why Charlie refused consent. It's because he didn't want to testify and put his appellate case in jeopardy. This isn't a mystery.
@8202mary
It doesn't matter at this point. He should have never taken the case to begin with. High risk all of the way of something like this happening. Dan knows everything must be in writing by the way. Even though it is no assurance which brings me back to my first point. Should not have taken the case. Thank you for your devotion to Dan's (and his family) justice.
@SDStellaD
❤
@bbrcummins1984
Charlie is just playing games with everyone , he's mad because his stupid defense strategies didn't work.
@candyorange266
Glad I watched till the end 😍