17 October
Videos
Was it that easy for Charlie to get a free bite at the apple? Not so Fast (includes prior analysis)
- tcweekly
- Adelson new evidence, adelson trial, charles adelson, Charlie Adelson, criminal analysis, Dan Markel, Dan Markel timeline, dan markel trial, donna adelson analysis, Donna Adelson calendar, donna adelson evidence, donna adelson in court, donna adelson trial, donna adelson trial updates, donna adelson updates, first appearance, james owens, murder, murder for hire, new adelson video, new on donna adelson, Sarah Boone, true crime community, wendi adelson, wendi adelson trial
- 22 Comments
Was it truly as simple as Charlie thought to seize an opportunity without consequences? Think again. The meticulous detective work done prior to this case reveals a tangled web of evidence that paints a much different picture. In fact, recent analysis has uncovered key details that suggest Charlie’s actions were anything but innocent. This case involves elements of deception, manipulation, and perhaps even premeditation. The truth behind this crime is far more intricate than initially meets the eye.
@MentourLawyer
I reviewed the motion, thanks Maya, and many pertinent facts are omitted- which I hope the State will prison a response – but if relinquishment is granted, I am ok with that – because I think this motion, based on what I know, has no chance (of course, there may be facts I don’t know, and judges don’t always get everything right).
@jimglatthaar4053
I think the issue is more complex than you are presenting. Rashbaum chose to protect Donna by withdrawing Donna & Harvey from testifying at Charlie's trial. This deprived Charlie of a witness to support his "double extortion" defense.
It makes sense for the Appellate Court to relinquish jurisdiction. If there was a conflict and prevented Charlie from getting a vigorous, non-conflicted defense, the Appellate Court would want that issue resolved at the same time it gets Charlie's appeal on the merits. If the Appellate Court declines to relinquish jurisdiction, and the Appellate Court thereafter affirms Charlie's conviction, only to have that conviction overturned on the conflict of interest/ineffective assistance of counsel grounds, the Appellate Court would have wasted its time.
@Damitashley
“Blade ent” or more commonly known as blatant
@sv7544
Ps; once they are found guilty, they will turn on anyone. Including the almighty “closer”.
@cliff.frankenberger
ML – thanks for your measured analysis. I agree with many of your points but what concerns me is the caveat you mentioned re whether a solid waiver exists after Donna and Harvey were removed from the witness list. In the video at around the 17-minute mark they were discussing the motion in limine and the stipulation of Donna and Harvey’s testimony and Everett confirmed “Mr. Adelson (Charlie) signed the stipulation for the record”. Capplman then mentioned to Judge Everett that they do have “other matters” and asked Everette if he prefers to have them in writing signed by the defendant to which Evertte said ‘yes’. I hope the prosecution & the court did the necessary CYA.
@allieGirl146
I hope you're right.
He didnt have a waiver. Hes not an ethical attorney. Hes CYA mide. Too late Rashy. I hope hes sanctioned by the bar.
@G.Harley.Davidson
In a nutshell, Rashbaum came up to Tallahassee, caused a dumpster fire , and walked away with a bag full of money. 🤦🏻♂️
@G.Harley.Davidson
Thanks ML, I always come to you for the facts, and the objective no BS analysis.
@anovemberstar
Honestly, orher YT channels rush to make comments just to get views it seems
@usaroxx8085
I disagree
The testimony of donna would have been detrimental to donna or harvey as their SYATEMENTS would be on the record
And
Only the state could give immunity
But I agree
The defendant CANNOT CREATE appealable error with KNOWN conflicts EVEN IF not a fully signed waiver. Charle is educated and thru the whole trial and even after NEVER complained about awww you had a conflict i did not know about AFTER 6 week trial????
@usaroxx8085
Thank you!!!!
Charlie cannot create reversible error ON A JURY VERDICT based on a situation created by the defendant found guilty
AND
AGREED donna was not even charged during any or charlie trial.
Not co-defendants.
Agreed THE SURPRISE defendants opening statements.
@Two_Deep
Thanks #mentourlawyer love your #truecrime channels 👍#floridaman #truecrimecommunity
@Fedeleness
The appellate lawyer has a ruling from a judge that Rashburn is unethical in his pocket.. He will get a new trial, so we watch him get convicted again. His own words during his testimony will sink him, even more than at the first trial. No worries.
@MattTaormina-y2k
Blame The Rash…he’s the culprit here…!
@matthewnewton8812
Well, Donna and Harvey were more than just “suspects”. Donna at least was an un-indicted coconspirator.
@matthewnewton8812
This is such a better and more calm and sober analysis than Carl Steinbeck’s wild claims about Charlie “DEFINITELY HAVING HIS CONVICTION OVERTURNED”.
I understand the issue so much better now. So it seems like all of this is possible, theoretical, hypothetical, maybe stuff. Sounds like it’s plausible, not totally out of the realm of possibility, but by no means a foregone concision.
@xtc-jewelry
I thank you ML for keeping this case alive for years. You are really excellent lawyer and I learn a lot just by watching your videos.
@seagate1686
The wait goes on
@seagate1686
Thank you ML!!❤
@HorseWithNoName1993
OH MAN IVE BEEN WAITING FOR YOUR TAKE ON THIS!! Does the Maestro win again?????? (puking over here)
@Erik.and.Lyle.Menedez
The corruption with Willie Meggs was astounding no one wants to talk about which led to a lot of this. It’s the worst kept secret in inner circles.
The kicker is guess who’s gonna handle Charlie’s appeal in the district attorneys’s office no other than Willie Meg‘s daughter
@tammytellez3481
Oh I can’t wait to hear this! Thank you our MENTOUR and team your work for justice is greatly appreciated…